As Chicago Public School students began the new school year Tuesday, Mayor Rahm Emanuel continued his push to implement a longer school day this year, offering hundreds of thousands of dollars to any elementary school willing to break with the Chicago Teachers Union and add extra time.
At a back-to-school event at STEM Magnet Academy, Emanuel and CPS CEO Jean-Claude Brizard offered up to $150,000 in discretionary funds and a roughly 2 percent raise for teachers at schools who elect to lengthen their day as part of a newly-created âLonger School Day Pioneers Program.â
On Friday, STEM was one of three schools where teachersâ voted to waive part of their contract and lengthen the school day by 90 minutes in exchange for that incentive package. Two other elementary schoolsâGenevieve Melody Elementary and Skinner North Elementaryâalso voted to lengthen their day, and there could be more to come, district officials said.
âThereâs other schools calling and weâre going to see which schools want to do it,â Emanuel said. âWeâre going to have it school by school until all our children finally get the length of day and length of year that they deserve.â
To join the program, a simple majority of teachers at a school must vote to waive portions of the existing union contract that deal with length of day and salary. Last month, the union rejected the districtâs offer to give elementary school teachers a 2 percent raise in exchange for adding 90-minutes to the school day.
CPS recently closed a projected $712 million deficit by cutting programs, positions and increasing property taxes. It would cost about $70 million If all of the districtâs 450-plus elementary schools moved to a longer day. A district spokeswoman insisted CPS will find funding for extended day incentives.
âAny school that wants to do this, we will support them,” said Becky Carroll. “Weâll find a way to pay for it.â
The union accused CPS of bribery and coercion in a letter to the districtâs labor relations office late Friday.
âThis method is an intentional act to divide the union and diminish the legitimate authority of the union to collectively bargain on behalf of its entire membership,â the letter said.
CTU Vice President Jesse Sharkey said the roughly 60 teachers at the three schools that approved a longer day do not represent the overall sentiment of CPS teachers. By targeting individual schools and dangling a large sum of money in front of them, the district is simply trying to find âposter children for teachers who donât support their own union,â he said.
District officials maintain that the principal and teachers at the three schools came to them seeking a longer school day.
STEM principal Maria McManus said her staff had been discussing a longer day since August 1, when staff received their schedules. âThe teachers asked for it,â she said.
After staff members expressed the desire for a longer day, McManus said she met with Jennifer Cheatham, the districtâs Chief Instruction Officer, to see if it was possible to implement a longer school day. A few days later, McManus received the âPrincipalâs Guide to Conducting a Waiver Vote on a Longer School Dayâ from the districtâs central office, with the word âconfidentialâ watermarked across each page.
This is STEMâs first year of operation and it did not yet have a union delegate. Last Friday morning, staff elected Luke Albrecht to the post and by Friday afternoon, 13 of the schoolâs 17 teachers voted in favor of a waiver that would allow STEM to have a longer school day.
A STEM staff member who participated in Fridayâs meeting said a CTU representative came to the school to speak to the staff about the waiver vote. The staff member said the representative seemed to be using âscare tacticsâ, at one point telling teachers he would put on his âmean hat.â
âHe made it seem like it was more about the rights and compensation and less about the importance of the extra time,â she said. âHe didnât really hear our voice.â
The union confirmed that it has had numerous conversations with teachers at the three schools that voted for the longer day but it declined to offer details.
McManus said STEM teachers were not aware of the districtâs $150,000 bonus offer before they took their vote. Still, teachers at other schools are now calling her teachers âsellouts,â she said.
The use of a waiver vote to amend sections of the union contract is not uncommon. Staff at some schools have used them to implement recess by moving the teachersâ lunch to the middle of the school day rather than the end. Yet they remain contentious for the union.
âWaivers were intended to address the fact that individual schools have unique circumstances,â Sharkey said. âThey were never intended to be a chance for the district to implement something system wide when the union says no. That was never the intention of the waiver processâ
The current union contract expires on June 30, 2012. The union and the district have been negotiating over salaries since the Board of Education voted in June to deny teachers a previously-negotiated 4 percent raise, citing a $712 million deficit.
Negotiations broke down roughly two weeks ago. Sharkey said CTU president Karen Lewis has reached out to Brizard and is waiting for a response. The current discussion over lengthening the school day âbelongs in the contract negotiations,â Sharkey said. âIt doesnât belong in the realm of dueling press releases.â
But Emanuel has shown no signs of backing off. With television cameras in tow, Emanuel visited all three of the schools that voted for a longer school day Friday. During his appearance at STEM, he urged parents to push for waivers at their childrenâs schools. âI hope parents continue to say, âHow can my school do what STEM did?ââ Emanuel said.
Many STEM parents were in favor of a longer school day. Sadika Langston, whose son is in first grade at the new school, said she was thrilled when the news broke over the weekend.
âSince when does CPS do things fast?â she said.


BRAVO. Keep ‘em coming. I have just emailed the principal of my son’s CPS school.
Rahm and Co. are engaging in some of the oldest and most despicable of union-busting tactics.
Read the following from the book (from a veritable Obi-wan/Yoda in the art of union smashing):
“CONFESSIONS OF A UNION BUSTER”,
by Martin Jay Levitt:(CAPS are mine)
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -
“Union Busting #16
“Favoritism and Division – Tactic #16
“MANAGEMENT SHOULD TRY AND REWARD COOPERATIVE OR ‘LOYAL’ WORKERS, WHILE SLANDERING AND PUSHING THOSE WHO UNCOOPERATIVE AND ‘DISLOYAL’.
“SUCH WORKERS MAY RECEIVE SPECIAL FAVORS, EXTRA TIME OFF, AND OTHER SUCH BONUSES. PRO-UNION WORKERS ARE are forced to undergo ever-tighter scrutiny, and are CONFRONTED WITH SCURRILOUS RUMORS SPREAD BY THE ANTI-UNION CAMPAIGN.
“Whenever the union attempts to hold constructive meetings of potential union members, a group of anti-union employees may be sent by union busting consultants with instructions to disrupt the meeting and PUT THE UNION ON THE DEFENSIVE.
“The anti-union employees might shout and sneer, or ask hostile, misleading questions. Some of them may be tasked with jotting down profuse notes whenever someone speaks to make pro-union workers uncomfortable.
“THE COMPANY GAINS FROM ANY DEFENSIVE OR ANIMOSITY CREATED BY SUCH TACTICS, FOR THE UNION CAN BE BLAMED FOR DRIVING ‘A WEDGE OF HATE INTO A ONCE-UNIFIED WORK FORCE.’ “[39]
[39] Confessions of a Union Buster, Martin Jay Levitt, 1993, pages 3, 28, 30, and 102-103.”